The Ice on the Moon is Better
If you're new here, I'd like to invite you to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thank you for visiting.
![]()
An article on the Telegraph news website from February of this year noted a chill in the relationship between Russia and the United States, and hinted at the possibility of a new Cold War in space. Adrian Blomfield’s piece “Russia sees moon plot in NASA plans” reports that Russian officials claim their nation’s offers the the United States to participate in a cooperative Moon effort have been rebuffed.
Why?
Because. The ice on the Moon is better.
And why is that?
Though it would be easy to imagine a customer of a Star Wars cantina making this odd comment (in subtitles), the real reason is that, assuming there is any ice there, it should be, unlike earthly ice, chock-full of an isotope of helium called helium 3.
A plentiful supply of helium 3 — rare on Earth, but abundant in space — combined with an as-yet unperfected nuclear fusion technology, could potentially provide an efficient source of power and a meaningful, clean alternative to fossil fuels for an energy-hungry Earth.
The Russian claim is that the United States wants to control it.
Tags: Clementine, Cold War, comets, Daniel Brenton, danielbrenton.com, David M. Harland, David S. Michaels, helium 3, lunar ice, Lunar Prospector, Moon, Red Moon, RussiaPosted: November 29th, 2007 under Space.
Comments: 1






