by Daniel Brenton on January 16, 2010
 |
|
|
|
|
The new cover for Red Moon
|
|
|
|
As the co-author of the Moon Race thriller Red Moon, I’m naturally pleased that the novel has continued to reach a sizable audience, driven mostly by word of mouth.
Some of you may have run across the new cover for Red Moon shown here. For reasons that escape me you won’t see this on the Amazon site, but you will see it on the Barnes and Noble site. I am holding off on updating the cover image here (and on the Luna 15 site where you can learn more than you ever wanted to know about it) because this may be changing yet again soon, and for a reason that I can’t talk about yet … though hopefully soon.
Over the last few months, Variance Publishing has hosted on their blog a number of posts featuring their offerings and commentary by their authors, and I was invited to contribute. Stanley Tremblay of Variance gave me permission to repost these here, and today’s post is the first of the three I contributed, a question and answer from the publisher about the book, and yours truly.
•
Authors Are People Too! – Daniel Brenton
Tidings Variance fans!
I hope you had a wonderful weekend and are excited for this, the last, Authors Are People Too! Our final guest is Daniel Brenton, co-author of RED MOON.
Q. What questions have you always wished people would ask you?
A. We managed to finagle a few interviews, a couple of them being by podcasters, which turned into interviews by phone or by Skype. One interviewer asked a question that I felt was really pretty thoughtful, to the point of being innovative: “Is there anything I didn’t ask that you wished I had?”
I think we both drew a blank at that point.
I didn’t realize interviews could lead to moments of hair-raising astonishment, but this one in particular did. I’ll need to set this up a little.
In the book, Dave Michaels used the historical character of S.P. Korolev, the father of (and driving force behind) the Soviet space program, to make the point that the space program was a way to divert attention (and some funding) away from the nuclear weapons race. On the other side of the ocean, he had a collaborator in spirit: most of you probably remember John Kennedy’s words that provoked America to throw the gauntlet down before the Soviet Union and challenge it to a duel in the heavens:
First, I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish.
With this, Kennedy did in fact turn the Cold War into a symbolic war in the heavens, which almost certainly distracted us from our seemingly hell-bent drive for Mutual Assured Destruction.
In the interview I made reference to this theme and specifically to Kennedy’s challenge, and managed to get out the sentence: “by doing this, he may in fact have saved the human race.” In the final podcast, the interviewer closed the episode by seizing on this sentence and repeating it staccato with several enhancing effects, which, frankly, gave me chills when I heard it.
[click to continue…]

by Daniel Brenton on January 3, 2010
We have the technology to save the world from asteroid and comet impacts. What part of “extinction” don’t we understand?

Dateline: MOSCOW – Russian Space Agency Chief Anatoly Perminov denies rumors that a planned mission to destroy the Earth-grazing asteroid Apophis was inspired by its uncanny resemblance to former U.S. President George W. Bush.
I spend some time now and then on the forums for The Paracast, Gene Steinberg’s and David Biedny’s premier podcast/radio show on the paranormal. A couple of days ago, David Biedny posted a link to this article from Yahoo News: “Russia may send spacecraft to knock away asteroid.”
As David noted … thank God the Russians are here to save us.
(If that seemed a bit sarcastic to you, well … you’re right.)
The article notes that the near-Earth object (NEO) Apophis, an asteroid about 887 feet wide, has been concerning astronomers for nearly six years now, due to how close it would be passing the Earth in 2029. According to this news release from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a collision with the Earth has been ruled out for the 2029 encounter, and for the remainder of the 21st century.
(I guess the Russians don’t trust our mathematics. Or something.)
False Steps Toward a Real Threat
However, this doesn’t rule out objects we don’t know about creating havoc on our planet. We are constantly being surprised by near-misses, such as the one described in this Universe Today article in 2004, a 33 foot wide object that passed overhead only about 4000 miles up.
Objects this small naturally pose little risk, but the real hazard is that this object was detected only shortly before its closest approach. Likewise the article notes that other objects have been detected only after they pass.
As confused as the Russian Space Agency Chief seems to be, he is correct in that asteroids — as well as yet-to-be-discovered long-period comets — pose enormous risks to our species. The suggestion that asteroidal and cometary impacts have triggered planet-wide extinction events has long been seriously discussed by the scientific community, and, despite our species’ arrogance, we are hardly any better prepared than the dinosaurs to preserve our existence should this ugly possibility occur today.
More of a “Boom” Than a “Bang”
So how much of a “boom” do we have to worry about?
[click to continue…]

by Daniel Brenton on October 10, 2009

Some thoughts about who we are.
Really.
I am a blogger typing away feverishly to catch the inspiration that has tapped me on the shoulder.
I am the toddler that made a nuisance of myself in the booth next to the blogger while the blogger tried to enjoy a not particularly cheap but simply excellent restaurant cheeseburger.
I am the distracted mother trying to control my kids in that booth who prays every night I won’t have to take my kids to a doctor because I have no health insurance.
[click to continue…]
